Monday, 20 November 2017

Even if something looks nice on the surface, if it doesn't have roots in fact, if it's not true to the bone, it will sooner or later rot, stink and fall apart. There is no good home on moving sands.
Fragmentary perception of thought is OK until it's OK.
Why would a sane person rely solely on what someone or some book says on the matter of morality and what is right living?

Do I have to look around for someone to tell me what to do or what not to do? There is a 'specialist' waiting at every corner of the street..

Or is it enough to stop abusing one's intelligence?

Know for yourself.
What does it mean to ask a question?
If one does it at all seriously, to really find out, one has to suspend all opinions. Surely the question cannot be used as a lead to an already formed conclusion in memory. There cannot be any limits to the exploration, one has to go from fact to fact and examine afresh, never from opinions, vested interests or sympathies.
It all naturally requires patience, honesty and humility, which may have a lot to do with doubt. So doubt if there is no proof, question, examine, never believe anything just because someone said it.

Saturday, 18 November 2017

I have gathered a notebook-thick bundle of cardboard tea packages in just a couple of months.. How much of say.. paper can be wasted at the scale of the whole planet?

Thursday, 9 November 2017

When you live on the Earth and you know nothing about science it seems natural to think that the Sun revolves around the Earth. But science proved it's the other way round. It took several hundreds of years to take root but it's now generally accepted knowledge. Technically in fact, what is going on is that the Earth, Sun and all the planets are orbiting around the center of mass of the solar system.
In a similar way, it's natural to think there is an unchanging self which is the centre of one's being. But modern psychology says there is no such thing. The self, the me, something which feels so close is just a superproduct of thought. There is no thinker, only thought.
It is a hard pill to swallow, for it is 'me' after all. So this knowledge may take a long time to take root in the society. But it is so, this is a fact.
Say you want to listen to your favorite song, one of the many you have, you listen to it once, another one and another one.. it's not so pleasurable anymore, right? You got tired of it, so you wanted more and more, like a drug. After all what do they say about smoking? That it goes well with drinking, etc.. But wait.. was the really so pleasurable the first time? Maybe the first few beats, the start of the melody, the first refrain? Or maybe.. it was only in thought, emotions stirred up by the music? Maybe the sounds are just sounds in fact? What if the best thing to do was not to play the song at all? Conserve the energy. Energy that we waste all day on this or that. Maybe that would actually lead to something that would turn out to be most joyful? DO NOT WASTE ENERGY, that is the true meaning of the words religion (religare), yoga, zen, dhjana. Be a passer-by.

Monday, 6 November 2017

One reaction to the Sutherland Springs shooting:

'I think Pres. XXXXX will have to decree that all Am-ans must be armed when they leave home.
More guns is the answer to more shootings.
Since Wisconsin just passed a law that there is absolutely no minimum age limit on who can hunt with guns, it follows that there will be no minimum age limit on who must be armed when they leave home.

Of course, the politicians will soon be on TV saying that now is not the time to discuss gun laws.

Edit: the Texas attorney general has just announced that these shootings would stop if more people carried concealed weapons.'

First of all of course it's a standard example of the chaos and contradiction produced by the fragmentary perception and confirmation that clinical retards occupy many highest positions in the society.

---------------

A very simple mechanism: If I carry a gun, you feel threatened. So you get a gun too.

Now we're all feeling threatened.

And if we are, someone will snap sooner or later and start firing because he's angry or scared or maybe not just mentally imbalanced (fragmentary perception) but clinically mentally ill.

--------------

Perhaps by pointing out that black is black, 2+2=4 and idiocy is idiocy there can be some most basic learning?
It is simple and completely obvious:
MORE guns, landmines, bombs, rockets, poison gas = MORE killing.
What can this obvious abuse of intelligence and refusal to see a basic fact be attributed to if not hypnosis by thought in fragmentary perception?

Thursday, 26 October 2017

People believe in gods and organized churches because of the fear of the end of the 'me', which is a super-product of thought. The 'me' wants to continue in time (which is also a super-product of thought).
Society based on belief and not on science is a chaotic monstrosity where violence, hypocrisy and contradiction rule. Just look around with fresh eyes.

Sunday, 8 October 2017

Religion is not based on faith, following somebody and certainly not on becoming a slave to a group or an idea.
The root of the word religare means to gather energy. Religion means to live intelligently. NOT in the afterlife or some other imaginary time or place to which I will get after a lot of struggle and suffering in the name of this or that.
So on the contrary, there is place for doubt in religion. That means not following any one, any authority and rather testing everything in one's life.
---------------------

If the Universe is a result of pure chance, it's doesn't make a tiny bit less miraculous the fact that there is Something rather than nothing at all. It is amazing and it's essential not to lose the amazement, the surprise, not if I have a lot of knowledge in physics or some other discipline. The important question is if I am out of neurosis, our of the turmoil created by those running around in hypnosis. if I have a chance. The only way to do this is Unitary Perception.
People a long time ago didn't know that the earth was revolving around the sun, yet there is some evidence that some of them at least identified what the origin of disorder was psychologically. They found out and understood what is most important.
Because otherwise, technology will work against us, destroy us rather than help to live more comfortably.
No amount of guns will ever save you from a nuclear bomb. More guns means just fear every day going to a grocery store.
--------------------

It is clearly a factor of disorder if I believe what some one said or wrote, perhaps some one with authority, accepting it without questioning. I don't check it out if it's true perhaps because I want it to be true, because it feels good.
Furthermore, it is not enough to see for oneself what the fact is, it is also necessary not to deny it when there is public pressure. It means not abusing ones intelligence in a group. It means standing alone.
------------------

One who is in turmoil psychologically, in anxiety, is perhaps more likely to want some order to be put from outside, by authority which will calm him, be it organized church, a party leader or a tyrant. To that he can subject himself and so swipe the problems under the rug. But they are there, unattended. Thus he becomes a slave. He will be told to do. And that's how an authoritarian society is formed.
------------------

When the wind of the rat race is swishing by I remember when I broke my tooth once in the office cause I was in a hurry.
It wasn't worth it.
------------------

It is a lie we can defend ourselves with some defensive shields in case of a nuclear attack. The scientists clearly say that it's not possible. They say this clearly because offensive power is simply far greater than any potential for defense in a nuclear conflict.
Costly investments in more rockets does not make the slightest sense. The only solution is that there is no war. Because the next world war, if there is one will be nuclear.
Only in Unitary Perception one can observe ones anxiety, anger and fear, without reaction and release. Otherwise my anxiety in fragmentary perception of thought is contributing to the conflict in the world.
------------------

In Awe.
In physics there is this a number of various important constants, for example the amount of dark energy in the Universe, 10 to the power of -123. They say the number couldn't be any smaller or bigger, otherwise galaxies had not formed. Why is it that this constant is precisely tuned to this value in our Universe? The answer that theoretical physics gives is that there is a multiverse with infinite number of Universes and each has it's own set of rules with the constants being different in each of them.. So by chance in our Universe the constants are just right.. It's just our world that happens to be right from INFINITE number of other universes.
Irrespective if it is true or not, it looks like we are INFINITELY lucky to be alive..




Thursday, 28 September 2017

For dialogue to be possible there must be a very basic understanding that it is necessary to go from fact to fact. Without the essential honesty relationship or dialogue cannot take place. 
That means if it's raining I don't say that the sun is shining because I want it to be so. I don't say that 2+2 = 5 or 3. 
If I am angry, I see that I am angry and not or react to it, just observe it along dialogue. I don't say I am not angry.
---------------------

Religion is not based on faith, following somebody and certainly is not on becoming a slave to a group or an idea.

The root of the word religare means to gather energy. Religion means to live intelligently. NOT in the afterlife or some other imaginary time or place to which I will get after a lot of struggle and suffering in the name of this or that.

So on the contrary, there is place for doubt in religion. That means not following any one, any authority and rather testing everything in one's life.
---------------------


If the Universe is a result of pure chance, it's doesn't make a tiny bit less miraculous the fact that there is Something rather than nothing at all. It is amazing and it's essential not to lose the amazement, the surprise, not if I have a lot of knowledge in physics or some other discipline. The important question is if I am out of neurosis, our of the turmoil created by those running around in hypnosis. if I have a chance. The only way to do this is Unitary Perception.
People a long time ago didn't know that the earth was revolving around the sun, yet there is some evidence that some of them at least identified what the origin of disorder was psychologically. They found out and understood what is most important.
Because otherwise, technology will work against us, destroy us rather than help to live more comfortably.

Sunday, 10 September 2017

Are dogs happier than humans and why? ๐Ÿ˜ƒ
They don't need passports.
Don't have politicians or lawyers.
No police and.. secret police..
They don't think too much about what will be or what was..
Why are you unhappy?

Because you always want.

Primarily some one or something to take away the anxiety.

Always trying to escape.
A society where footballers are highest paid and teachers lowest.

And they say they love their children.

2+2 = 3

Wednesday, 6 September 2017

Right action is free from all motives, for profit, pleasure, power, prestige.

Some one sees that all over the world 'meditation' is associated with concentration and hypnosis and advertised as the intelligent solution to problems. But it is madness.

He sees clearly that it's wrong, it's a colossal mistake. So he says that there is no freedom in concentration, hypnosis, escapes, they are not a solution, on the contrary they add to the confusion.

First one tries to be successful in business and when he's not, he turns to 'spirituality' and makes often tremendous efforts in this direction. Or those who are successful in business and amassed a lot of wealth, now start in the other direction.

In both cases it's the me. That elephant will not go through the keyhole however hard it tries.

If a motive comes up, all we can do is simply include it in the perception of everything perceptible.

Monday, 4 September 2017

The reserves of oil will run out completely in around 30 years from now.
Which means the end of automobiles, long distance travel, satellites, rockets!, tanks, airplanes, helicopters..
Prices skyrocket.. soap, diapers, drinking water,. Tractors.. Hey, tennis, football, etc. all sport competition only local. It can happen any time really.
Billion people wont charge electric cars overnight when there's need of energy for production of the most important things like medicine. And the power plants run on coal..
How to dispose of nuclear waste without petrol? How to transport coal to the plants? Electric cars will be needed for that. They will probably be reserved for the government..
Living in the cities will be very hard. Farm life should be OK but I doubt they won't be ravished or controlled by the governments.
Do the politicians even see the roadblock or prepares for it? Of course..
Hell.. I'm really trying to looking at it realistically how is it possible to feed and provide sufficient healthcare for 60 billion people or whatever the number is currently..
It really does start to look like Mad Max but much more crowded..
The petrol era was nice while it lasted but it was short..

Sunday, 27 August 2017

Would not a serious attempt to answer that question have to first acknowledge that language carries with itself the problem?

In fragmentary perception 'I' have a 'problem' (with this or that). So that affirmation already contains the horizontal conflict (the subject vs the object). 

So firstly we see that we must be very careful with language.

The thinker and (his) thoughts.

But when it is attempted without effort to perceive everything perceivable at the same time, including thought, in this true factual perception there is no thinker.

There is no thinker, only thought. The fact is that the thinker is the product of thought. 

This is not just a conclusion (knowledge) but an observable fact.

And what is the pillar of the human society? And what an enormous structure was built on the illusion?



Do we see the consequences?

Saturday, 26 August 2017

Interesting question.
A shock when one loses something one thinks is valuable (part of his self, his pleasures) can last for 2, 3 days or even longer. Then the fact seems to get accepted, assimilated, transcended.
But why does it have to happen in the first place? Why does it have to start at all?
Because one is attached to that thing, isn't it? Attachment meaning conditioned thought, memory.

Wednesday, 23 August 2017

To make America.. (Russia, Azerbaijan, etc) great (again)?

Please.. You cannot. Obviously. You can struggle, fight, try to subdue the others or win the economical competition.

But if a river is polluted outside of the imaginary borders, it affects you. If the forests are cut down in the poor countries, violent storms will flood your house.

'America' is not something that exists alone. You can't make it great and all the others stay in shambles. You are intelligent enough to figure it out why. It's very simple.

It's not possible to make Japan, England or Guatemala great in separation.

It is possible to make the World a great place.

And it begins with understanding my self.

Sunday, 13 August 2017

A sad song may be ringing in the ear because it played in a shop or in a bus but one knows that's not true. So what's the problem?

Sadness may happen but it's not a problem, it's perceived together with all sound, vision and gravitation. Without effort. And actually it's not sadness anymore, the name.

Do not be attached to anything psychologically. Do not grab and hold a hot coal, it burns. You only imagine it could be oh so great if you could only hold it, that it only has good sides. In fact there are always two sides to something. The good and the dreadful. The other side of pleasure is fear, sorrow and anger.

Do not believe that old tale sold on postcards from vacation that by touching the world and getting burned you will be happy. That you must get entangled. You don't have to.

But first of all, do not cling.

Do not want anything.


Friday, 4 August 2017

There is an observable failure of the school.

Along a retreat from science to so called religion, political conspiracy theories.

Escape from reality.

Wizards, fables, Superman, Batman and other super-heroes, vampires.

Music, computer games, overwork, entertainment, getting intoxicated, violence.

Children at school learn that there is Germany, Japan and France but they don't learn why, what it means and whether it is necessary to be so.

They learn about so called religions but not what is religion really.

Differential calculus is taught but not what is thought, fragmentary perception, Unitary Perception and how to live sanely.

Thursday, 3 August 2017

- Do you claim you are energy?
- Please, first of all we must begin in peace, cause otherwise we just sputter a lot of words like machine guns and just wait for our turn. So peace is at the beginning, not at the end.
It is only possible if we try to perceive all perceptible at the same time as we try to tackle the question.
By tackle I mean we together uncover the subject, nobody is forcing an issue, pushing the answer on anyone else, we are talking together as friends, not foes fighting on opinions.
[silence]

So what do we mean when we say 'I am energy'?
We have to be clear. What do we mean by the 'I'?
The ego? The thinker? The so called soul? The soul is an invention of thought surely, isn't it? No one has proven its existence, there is no evidence. So when some one says 'I am energy' he means the me, right? But the me is just thought! Please, this is of utmost importance to see: There is no thinker, only thought. It can be factually perceived in the total observation, which includes all thought which we call Unitary Perception.

So obviously if the question is understood in the fragmentary perception of thought only, than it is false, it has no meaning.
The truth is 'I' am nothing. That is a fact. I am a super product of thought.

So the sentence: 'There is one energy, not divided, is correct.

But if we put at the front, the speaker's intentions become questionable, because of the inherent falsity in the language, the horizontal conflict: the illusionary division into the thinker and thought, the me and the world, the 'inside' and the 'outside' and so on.

Wednesday, 2 August 2017

We are conditioned to think that we are the 'thinkers' of 'our' thoughts, that we produce them and 'own' them.

However when we test the situation, we can easily see that we do not control thoughts, it's the other way round, it is thoughts make us crazy.

We cannot control thought because we are thought. The 'I', the 'me' is a superproduct of thought.

There's a differential calculus but this basic fact is not taught at school.

Non-functional thought can make us feeling miserable and suicidal, angry and scared. It is a channel of desire.
Therefore we have disappointed teenagers drinking themselves to stupor, troubled people feeling panic attacks or businessmen jumping out of windows.

There is no thinker, only thought.

It is an observable fact in Unitary Perception.

Monday, 31 July 2017

The school does not carry out its mandate. The students are taught differential calculus but not about thought, fragmentary perception and Unitary Perception.
That is one of the reasons why children and people are so susceptible to propaganda of advertising or political.
If they get swindled by one political party they turn to another one, which exploits them equally or worse.
If they are fed up with one amusement, they exchange it for another.

Wednesday, 26 July 2017

One living in the fragmentary perception, hoaxed into the belief that he is the 'me' inside the body lives in conflict and contradiction which is dissipation of energy.  Whatever name  we could give to the state of neurosis and alienation from the Universe, surely it cannot be sanity?

Tuesday, 25 July 2017

It has been said that it's harder to crack an atom than human prejudice.
Also that the first impression is most important.

It's interesting to observe how persistent and difficult to change a once formed opinion or habit can be.

In fragmentary perception, once a judgement is made and memory is formed, learning ends.

The reality can change but the old memory stays and it remains the basis of our actions.

We all have been programmed from a very young age by the society, the family, the church, the school to believe I am a Russian, a Spaniard or an Englishman, a catholic or a Muslim. And the memory stays as the basis of our action.

An outward change based on false assumptions, for example political, can only multiply problems and strengthen conflicts and ultimately lead to a revolution or a war of one group against another.

Therefore it is of utmost importance that perception is constant and encompassing everything that is happening.

In the Unitary Perception all perceptible is perceived without effort or motive and it is not connected with memory.

Monday, 24 July 2017

How does self-illusion happen?

We can experience, if we are attentive, how thought process functions all by itself when we fall asleep or in dreaming. The chain of thoughts happens all by itself in total hypnosis (there is no perception of anything else, only the products of thought process).

During the day in the fragmentary perception, something interesting happens with the thought process. There appears a part of thought which imagines itself as divided from and the controller (experiencer, owner, thinker) of all the other thoughts. It happens very fast and is very persistent in fragmentary perception. It is the constantly interwoven memory of 'I am this', 'that happened to me', 'I am going to do that tomorrow', etc. This self-story apparently (through horizontally arranged memories) moves in time (from 'the past' to 'the future').

To see that the division into thinker and thought is an illusion and not a fact, all thoughts have to be perceived, with all sound and all what is perceivable at the same time. Without choice, motive or effort.

In this all-encompassing observation, the absence of division is directly perceived.

What sees is all there is.