Each moment is a holy day, birthday, girl's and boy's day, Sun day even if it rains.

Do not waste it in the prison of the fragmentary perception of thought.

Through millenia people have tried various things to get out of the misery in the fragmentary perception of thought. It usually meant torturing themselves mildly or harshly. They still largely fall in that trap (self-improvement, mantras, transcendental meditation, prayer, concentrating on the breadth, dancing, singing, hypnosis, so called psychotherapy, etc.)

Unitary Perception is the only door to freedom. But it is a narrow door.

In UP, we attempt without effort to perceive everything perceptible at the same time.

We are not concerned about the result of the attempt.

If you reading another self-help book, of which there are many on the market, answer yourself this one question:

does it help you transcend fear, sorrow, desire NOW (immediately)?

If you hope it will happen at some point 'in the future', you are deceiving yourself.

Transcend means: there is no suffering but the state is not sought after.

In Unitary Perception there is no conflict between the observer and the observed, the subject (the me) and what it wants (the objects). UP is very simple, it's being conscious of everything perceptible, in the brain. No effort is required. All the energy is already coming to the posterior parts of the brain, this happens naturally by itself, yet the other parts of the brain are not aware of it. So it's a matter of waking up to the energy (second awakening after sleep), rather than applying effort.

Attachment to objects causes an illusionary division between the subject and the object (the observer and the observed), so the illusion of psychological time.

Psychological suffering (fear, sorrow, desire, despair) is caused by the illusive fragmentation caused by thought.

This mechanism is one of the characteristics of the fragmentary perception of thought.

The epistemological definition of Unitary Perception is: observation encompassing the observer and the observed at the same time.

Unitary Perception is freedom from illusion.

The epistemological definition of Unitary Perception is observation encompassing the observer and the observed.

Unitary Perception is not directed towards any object.

Freedom is when there is no desire for anything. Wanting anything means illusion that there is a division, so the illusion of psychological time.

Thought in the fragmentary perception is incoherent and confused. It doesn't know what it's doing when it's perpetuating comparison, division, conflict and violence, fear, sorrow.

One definition of a belief is: a very strongly held opinion.

In the all-encompassing Unitary Perception there is no 'time'. It is because what is known in the fragmentary perception as 'time' is a superproduct of thought.

The most basic desire-thought is for the 'me' to continue 'tomorrow'. My prestige, my expertise, my achievements, esteem, plans, possessions and struggles, all my empire, it's all put together by thoughts.

The me has no substance. The whole structure of self is but a tangle of memories, empty in the core.

This is not only a theory, there can be a direct perception of the fact, which is called Unitary Perception. UP is simply the factual perception, as opposed to the fragmentary perception of thought, sorrow and fear.

How much of that what politicians talk about so ardently is just imagination, ideas, thought?

How much of what we think and fight about is just compositions of essentially nothing?

There are thousands of possible objects that one can want and the process is always connected with suffering. Wanting anything special IS suffering, it is imagining being a subject divided from the object.

1. Desires are often contradictory, it's impossible to go south and north at the same time. Some desires are plain impossible ('I wish I could go back in time and correct my mistakes') and yet there are a tape-loops of non-functional thinking anyway.

2. Desires always deal with time, they are to be realized in the future. Desire IS psychological time.

3. Fear and sorrow follow desire like shadow, fear and sorrow are the other side of the coin.

Reality is different than night dreams. What is real, which is always only now, has a multitude of facets, colours and immeasurable richness. Dreams are illusions, they are false, untrue.

There's an ad on the wall in a pub: 'Free beer tomorrow'.

An example of a tragi-comedic pseudo-psychological advice:

'Meditate regularly to regulate ego'

You don't want to kill it permanently, but you want to be able to enter states where it is incredibly suppressed, and other states where it's unleashed.

True mastery is control over the ego and the ability to switch between these 2 systems.'

One question: What/Who is the 'you' that wants to take 'control'?

Is it rocket science to see the simple trick?

A: Do you regret xxx?

B: Have I xxx? It was not me.

In a fragmentary perception, so in fear, anger, sorrow, things can escalate very fast. The ruts of tradition are most intimate. We are xxx and they are yyy. So there must be borders, walls, because we have to defend ourselves against the enemy. So warfare, army, so a preemptive strike, so war. It can be over something imaginary, a trifle. Was there a bomb on the plane or it just crashed because of bad weather?

An obsessed mind changes to the usual track in the fifth sentence. Don't tell me you control thought. You control thought or thought makes you crazy?

You should never be here too much; be so far away that they can’t find you, they can’t get at you to shape, to mould. Be so far away, like the mountains, like the unpolluted air; be so far away that you have no parents, no relations, no family, no country; be so far away that you don’t know even where you are. Don’t let them find you; don’t come into contact with them too closely. Keep far away where even you can’t find yourself; keep a distance which can never be crossed over; keep a passage open always through which no one can come. Don’t shut the door for there is no door, only an open, endless passage; if you shut any door, they will be very close to you, then you are lost. Keep far away where their breath can’t reach you and their breath travels very far and very deeply; don’t get contaminated by them, by their word, by their gesture, by their great knowledge; they have great knowledge but be far away from them where even you cannot find yourself. For they are waiting for you, at every corner, in every house to shape you, to mould you, to tear you to pieces and then put you together in their own image. Their gods, the little ones and the big ones, are the images of themselves, carved by their own mind or by their own hands. They are waiting for you, the churchman and the Communist, the believer and the non-believer, for they are both the same; they think they are different but they are not for they both brainwash you, till you are of them, till you repeat their words, till you worship their saints, the ancient and the recent; they have armies for their gods and for their countries and they are experts in killing. Keep far away but they are waiting for you, the educator and the businessman; one trains you for the others to conform to the demands of their society, which is a deadly thing; they will make you into a scientist, into an engineer, into an expert of almost anything from cooking to architecture to philosophy. Keep far, far away; they are waiting for you, the politician and the reformer; the one drags you down into the gutter and then the other reforms you; they juggle with words and you will be lost in their wilderness. Keep far away; they are waiting for you, the experts in god and the bomb throwers: the one will convince you and the other [show you] how to kill; there are so many ways to find god and so many, many ways to kill. But besides all these, there are hoards of others to tell you what to do and what not to do; keep away from all of them, so far away that you cannot find yourself or any other. You too would like to play with all of them who are waiting for you but then the play becomes so complicated and entertaining that you will be lost. You should never be here too much, be so far away that even you cannot find yourself.

I see that I am caught in habit. Politically, religiously, as a writer, as a painter, as a man or a woman, I am caught in a particular way of thinking. Being an Englishman, I have a certain tradition with a fixed attitude towards life, or I am trained in Catholicism, in this or in that, and it has become a habit. Can that habit be broken immediately, or must it be done away with gradually over the years? If I say it will take time, that it must be done away with gradually over the years, what then is the state of my mind? Obviously my mind is lethargic, dull, unaware.
Nationalism, for example, is a habit, and it can be broken instantly; but it gives us pleasure, it gives us a sense of importance to be identified with a particular country, especially if it is a powerful one. Most of us like being identified with a particular government, with the flag, and all the rest of that nonsense, so we don't want to break the habit of nationalism, and then there is no problem. But if you want to break that habit - and you can only break it instantly, not over the years - then how is it to be done?
Is there a method by which to break a habit? Surely, a method implies time, moving from a beginning to an end. If you see for yourself that time does not free you from habit, and that methods or systems are therefore of no avail, then you are actually faced with the fact that your mind is caught in habit. You are faced with it, not through words, not through ideas, but you directly see the fact that your mind is crippled with habit; it is inescapably so. And then what happens? You are not trying to change a habit; you are not trying to break it down. You are simply faced with the fact that your mind functions in the groove of habit. And what happens when you are directly faced with a fact? What happens if you come face to face with the fact that you are a liar, that you are jealous? If you don't try to change it, than the fact itself gives you enormous energy to break the fact completely. When you are directly faced with the fact, your mind is no longer dissipating itself in escapes, in denials, in trying to change the fact through time[...]

Would Jesus Christos and Gotama Buddha want to have anything to do Christianity or Buddhism?

Would they be a part of the hierarchy, the tradition, the beliefs, the strange rites, hopes, prayers, mantras, incense and incantations. The establishment. The divisions. Amassing land and possessions. Prestige and power. Sprinkling holy water on new guns.

Obsessive thinking about an a problem has never fixed anything. Obsessive analysis = paralysis.

There are correct decisions both in mathematics and in life. You don't say 2+2=3 because you are afraid. You don't pronounce that a problem unsolvable just because it's difficult.

The basic reason of doing addition or multiplication correctly is not to get an end result. It is because it's the correct way to do it.

Similarly in life one doesn't do something correctly for a result, when everyone else is obviously abusing intelligence. One does something correctly because it is correct, in accordance with fact or truth.

Why is division so prevalent and pervasive in every sphere of living in the human society? Political, professional, gender, geographical, religious divisions, rich vs poor,  my team vs your team.

Division, which is at the root of conflict, is an attribute of the fragmentary perception of thought.

People want to see secret miracles but they are so tired and hypnotized that they don't perceive the real Miracle happening.

If you suffer psychologically, just wait a moment and observe, observe everything what is happening, the sounds, the colours.. and also observe that you want something. That wanting is the suffering at the same time. On a lower level that wanting is simply thought, non-functional thought to be precise. You can all it desire (for security, people, money, a house, success, etc.), fear or anger, it doesn't matter because it's the same process, the same mechanism. Desire is followed by fear like a shadow, they go together.

It's an art to keep fear and desire on a leash. Not to change it, not to touch it, not to react to it, just observe it like a precious jewel, its every movement. Together with perceiving everything perceivable at the same time.

Three Violent Films

I don't know how one who is attached to the various forms of modern entertainment can find real peace in this world.

The film Favor (2013) which is getting good reviews on the net.. Who makes shocking shows of nonsensical cruelty like that? Do people really behave this way, do they do such things? Surely not on a regular basis. And who watches the films with interest other than perhaps for a study of human madness?

I'm afraid it the creators of movies like the one above or say The Hateful Eight (2015) or Edge (2015) may have crossed the threshold of the level of 'unbalanced' that most people live in. If one had to take some positives from it, one could argue that it's certainly better to make films about sadistic and murderous tendencies than to become a serial killer. I'm sorry if I offended anyone, please take it just as a precaution..

The structure of sorrow works through comparison, this time is compared to some better time (past of future), this (worse) situation is compared to that (better situation).The transmitter in the mechanism is thought.

The mechanism of comparison can be useful functionally, at work, in science, to build a bridge. Psychologically however, it's a factor of degeneration.

One is having a meal and is thinking of the 'better' meal he had yesterday. But it's because one does not perceive what is happening, the colours, the tastes, the thoughts, the sounds, the weight, all together at the same time, now. It is the only Meal we have, this one always now, forever infinitely extraordinarily new and special. The changing objects are of less importance. What is most important is the quality of perception, Unitary Perception.

The so called 'I' with it's illusions, attachments, desires, anxieties, fears, the whole structure of self-torture, is
 a superproduct of thought.
That means there is no 'me', only thought.
It is not a theory, it is a directly observable fact of the Unitary Perception, perception of everything perceptible at the same time, including all thought, right now, without any effort.

We struggle all our lives for something. Maybe we don't even know what exactly. Something that will full satisfy us, give us complete happiness. But we don't know it, we never find it. We take drugs, drink, have sex, relationships, make money. When we have time to sit on the couch and look and listen, we feel lost, we think we are lonely so we start more frantic activity. But nothing seems to quench that strange unsatisfactoriness.
Isn't the whole anxious stir caused by thought in the fragmentary perception?
Can it end completely in the total observation called Unitary Perception?

There is an intelligence that is higher than the genes. The genes tells you need to reproduce, follow the crowd, attack the 'enemy'.

The genes tell the woman that she needs strong male hands to give her 'security'. But the synonyms of security can be control, slavery and oppression. The woman like everyone else must have passion in herself and for herself, not from outside, to be psychologically independent and unattached, to be able to be on her own free of self-pity. That is the only way for the man and for woman alike.

If we need psychological security from the outside, be it a person, profession, organized religion or nation, it will bring a seed of fear with it.

I would agree that one characteristic of a mad person is that he or she doesn't test their sobriety. They don't question themselves. On the contrary, they usually seem extremely confident. They strongly believe in their 'cause', whatever it can be. They draw the masses with the confidence, with such tragic consequences.

Their true motives and intentions, their psychological centre called the self, which is a superproduct of thought, are hidden in the shadow of the fragmentary perception.

Few seem to be interested what non-functional thought is, how hypnotic and dangerous it can be in the fragmentary perception. It's not taught anywhere. I had a course of 'psychology' during my studies. The professor recited some theories that didn't make sense, we had to memorize some of it to pass exams from books that didn't make sense either. Some guys with authority in the field must have developed theories cause they had nothing to do, what they said was written down and than copied mindlessly.. whatever load of rubbish it was.

I knew a 'psychologist' once. She went to meetings to chant mantras and whatnot. She said it helped her develop her She was a doctor of psychology then.

To want things to stay as they are in the fragmentary perception of thought: the selfishness, tradition, tribalism, the flags, the national hymns, the so called religions, conflict, environmental pollution, overpopulation

is

to go over the precipice.

'I am German', 'I am American', 'I am Russian', 'I am Christian', 'I am Muslim', 'I am a Jew', the flags, the national hymns, the teams.. the tribes, the sects =

madness on planet Earth.

With a wise man there's a lot of solutions. With a fool there's a lot of problems. If one stays with fools one has to be extremely vigilant and careful not to fall into their holes with them.

One can live with despair, anger or desire without touching them and without trying to escape them with entertainment, drugs, violence, etc. Just letting them be like a wild animals roaming the fields. Just observing  everything perceptible at the same time, perceiving all that is happening without any reaction. Then what happens with despair?

Psychological well being does not depend if one gets what one wants, the objects of our obsessions, but if desire is observed intelligently, without any reaction, in UP.

Without the essential function of UP, desire and accompanying fear, turn into a psychological structure of torture. 'Myself' is that. It's a superproduct of thought run by desire, anger and fear, unperceived when it semi-automatically acts (in the 'shadow').

 Some one who doesn't learn UP, will not find a solution for UP is THE solution.

It is important to ask 'why'. It's important to question everything. Only one who questions can penetrate through layers of illusion, hypocrisy and superstition.

It's important not to take anything for granted, not to believe just because something is claimed by a lot of people or by those with authority, who are usually have a lot of confidence in what they say and what they do.

Questioning is part of both scientific and truly religious approach.

Religion is NOT BELIEVING in something. Religion, among other things, means finding out in one's life what is correct, factually, and moving from fact to fact, even when it's a fact which isn't comfortable for me, something I don't 'like'. I move on nevertheless.