B: The way I see it, there is a change. I would say that thought is "crippled" in UP.  In UP there are no products of thought like the thinker, time, duality, effort, direction, choice, right? Thought in C is direction, choice, etc.

The little energy of thought/"meaning" dissolves in the Wholeness of UP.

The focused/ directional Known is BOUND to dissolve in the Unknown. Cannot survive!

IF that was so, these two (C - the focused perception and B - the unfocused perception) would not be really complementary, but rather exclusive.. How can UNFOCUSED hold the FOCUSED?

How can the Unknown hold the Known/ the "meaning"? If it held the known and understood it, would it be really the Unknown?

Thought (of the Anterior brain) can function either as a substitute or complement of the Energy (in the Posterior brain).

I'm not sure it's the complement..

They're of two different dimensions, characterized by different laws!

A:  They work together, complementing each other, it's a fact. But you won't arrive at the fact by rationalizing and comparing words with words

B: I am not doing just that. In UP thoughts come and go freely, "pizza", "bananas", "potatoes", images. If they are being processed, it's already hypnosis...

 Absolute time is one of the laws of C but is it possible NOT to THINK in terms of TIME at all?

OR.. all thought is (psychological) time and (psychologcal) time is thought?

.. In other words: is the thought enveloped in B the same 'full-fledged" thought as in C (i.e. involving time, duality, incoherence, hypnosis, concentration, egotism, etc.) or is it DIFFERENT?

If it's DIFFERENT, how does the "change" happen in B? But if it's the SAME, how could B hold C and not be itself of time?

"Enveloping C in B" would mean that the Unknown can understand the meaning of the Known and REMAIN the Unknown..

But can thought REALLY survive the Unknown, the Present, the Reality?